论自由心证与法官自由裁量权

法律论文编号:SS011   包括:开题报告,中英文摘要,论文,目录,文献综述,任务书,答辩,中期检查表,等   论文字数:8112,页数:13

目    录
摘要 .............................................................III
Abstract .........................................................IV
前言............................................................. 1
一、自由心证与法官自由裁量权概述................................. 1
（一）自由心证概述 ...............................................1
（二）法官自由裁量权概述......................................... 2
二、自由心证和法官自由裁量权在我国的现状 .........................4
（一）自由心证的立法现状 .........................................4
（二）法官自由裁量权现状 .........................................5
三、自由心证与法官自由裁量权的关系 ...............................6
（一）自由心证与法官自由裁量权的区别 .............................6
     1.性质不同.................................................. 6
     2.强制性不同 ................................................6
     3.内容不同.................................................. 6
（二）自由心证与法官自由裁量权的联系............................. 6
     1.自由心证与法官自由权相互呼应，一脉相承.................... 6
     2.自由心证与法官自由裁量权都依赖司法独立的实现 ..............7
四、自由心证与法官自由裁量权在司法实践中出现的问题 ...............8
（一）超自由心证主义 .............................................8
（二）法官权力滥用 ...............................................8
五、解决问题的途径............................................... 9
（一）内部制约................................................... 9
     1. 自由裁量权必须依法行使................................... 9
     2. 提高法官职业道德素质..................................... 9
（二）外部制约 ...................................................10
   1. 制定判断自由裁量权是否合法合理的标准 .......................10
   2. 实现司法独立 ...............................................10
结论 ............................................................11
参考文献 .........................................................12
致谢............................................................ 13

摘    要
      自由心证与自由裁量权是近年来我国诉讼法学界讨论的热点问题，但关于两者对比研究的文章很少。本文从两者的关系角度出发，从五个方面对两者进行论述，首先论述了自由心证和法官自由裁量权的渊源和内涵；其次论述了两者在我国的现状：再次对比分析了两者之间的区别与联系；列举了两者在司法实践中出现的问题；最后在总结两者的联系的基础上提出解决问题的方法。本文认为解决了法官自由裁量权滥用的问题也就解决了自由心证的问题。

关键词: 自由心证 自由裁量权 职业道德

Free eva luation of evidence and discretionary power
Abstract
In recent years, free eva luation of evidence and the discretion power have been discussed in field of China's civil procedure. But scholars rarely discuss the connection between free eva luation of evidence and the discretion power. The paper contain five parts, first it elaborates on free eva luation of evidence and the discretion power . secondly it talk about the current situation of them in china. Thirdly it talk about the connection of them by contrasting qualities and so on . fourthly it enumerate the defect of them .the last part of the paper advance the point of view that base on the connection .If the problem of discretionary power is solved , the problem of free eva luation of evidence will be solved too.
Key words:  free eva luation of the evidence； discretionary power；  professional ethics